When Calling Someone a Mutant isn't Hate

4th response published in the the Badger Herald Article of online comments: "Reason, reason, reason, insanity"

In response to “Proposition 8 exposes a new prejudice” by Laura Brennan:

First of all, there is nothing wrong with being anti-homosexual. It doesn’t make you a bigot, or any other flavor of the week leftist hate speech word. The argument of trying to compare alleged homosexual discrimination with that of the blacks is so flawed that I don’t even know where to begin. The fact of the matter is that homosexuality is wrong, plain and simple. Relationships are based on the hope that those involved will reproduce to keep the human species going. That obviously can’t happen with gays. I could write for hours and continue to provide facts that would allow me win this argument, but I’ve done it so many times with this paper that it is just old. The bottom line: homosexuality is wrong, unnatural, and is essentially human species mutation. Those who are don’t deserve equal rights or benefits because they aren’t humans like the rest of us, they are essentially mutants.

Thank you Badger Herald for aptly titling this comment, and thank you "bigot[s], or any other flavor of the week leftist hate speech word[s]" for creating the wonderfully inadequate arguments Laura Brennan has bought into. In fact, I aught to draft up a new amendment and start getting signatures. It'll redefine marriage as a union between two people who can procreate (having a gay child doesn't count because they are of a different species). Do you think we should start a mutant registry, or is Facebook and Myspace an adequate registry. Also, how do we deal with Gays? Should they be forced to procreate? Should we add a new species to the list? I suggest the name Homosapians. Darn, it's already taken. Perhaps we should just consider heterosexuality a mutation and call people inflicted with it Heterosapians. Also, how do we deal with animals that exhibit homosexuality? Are they invasive species?

The best part is that I've heard this "Mutant" theory before. Earth is starting to get overcrowded, so the human race has evolved to produce less offspring! Gays are saving the world! Even better, lets flip the situation. In a bleak future, nearly everyone is gay, and the world is turning into the movie "Children of Men." Instead of letting schools decay, however, they are turned into massive dance clubs, the world is fabulous. Wait a second, doesn't this scenario mean that gays don't want to raise children? Oh darn, that doesn't make any sense at all, as proven by the fact that there are legal battles in nearly every state trying to allow gay couples to adopt children.

I could write for hours and continue to provide facts that would allow me to win this argument, but I'm going to take a tip from Laura Brennan and assume that my pompus "I'm right, you're wrong... and you're unhuman" less than solid and complete argument will win over some of you readers.

Thank you Laura Brennan for showing your true colors. Now I'm off to watch X-Men and try and figure out what superpower gay people get. I hope its superhuman dancing abilities. That would be FABULOUS!